Emails

Search

View By:

    Browse By Tag

    Search Results:Sort By Rating  1 2 3 ... 26 27 »

    1. schijatov - 826209667.txt1996-03-07 14:41:07

      Subject: schijatov Date: Thu, 7 Mar 96 09:41:07 +0500 Dear Keith, March 6, 1996 I and Eugene received your E-mail of 04.03.1996. This day I talked over the telephone with Eugene and he asked me to send an answer from both of us. Thank you for the information concerning proposals to the INCO/COPERNICUS. We agree with your strategy used and we hope that this proposal will not be rejected. The res...

    2. schiyatov - 835015638.txt1996-06-17 12:47:18

      Subject: schiyatov Date: Mon, 17 Jun 96 08:47:18 +0500 Dear Keith, I have bought the tickets from Moscow to London and back. My arrival to London (Heathrow Airport) is by flight SU 245 (Aeroflot Company) on July 19. Departure from Moscow is at 20.10 (local time), arrival to London is approximately at the same local time. As I know, Evgeny Vaganov did not bay tickets until now, but he informed of my dates and can bay tickets the same flights...

    3. URGENT RESPONSE NEEDED - Early Detection Work - 835819980.txt1996-06-26 20:13:00

      Subject: URGENT RESPONSE NEEDED - Early Detection Work Date: Wed, 26 Jun 1996 16:13 -0700 (PDT) Dr. Jones, I am contacting you on behalf of Dave Bader and Tim Barnett regarding a couple action items in support of early detection on climate change. Based upon the anticipated award for NOAA support during fiscal year 1997 on climate change data and detection, DOE has authorized the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) to utilize exis...

    4. Re: your mail - 837094033.txt1996-07-11 14:07:13

      Subject: Re: your mail Date: Thu, 11 Jul 1996 10:07:13 -0400 (EDT) Dear Phil, It looks like you have found Baitoushan. Vol. 2 lists Kuwae as VEI 6 in 1452 +/- 10 AD. How accurate are your dates? By the way, Chris Newhall thinks 1600 is the Parker volcano on Mindanao in the Philippines. He hasn't published that so far, as I know. Could you please define "utter prat" for me? Sometimes I think we speak the same language, and sometimes I'...

    5. Cambridge details - 837197800.txt1996-07-12 18:56:40

      Subject: Cambridge details >Cc: Neil Loader > >At 08:47 17/06/96 +0500, you wrote: >>Dear Keith, >> I have bought the tickets from Moscow to London and back. My arrival >>to London (Heathrow Airport) is by flight SU 245 (Aeroflot Company) on >>July 19. Departure from Moscow is at 20.10 (local time), arrival to London >>is approximately at the same local time. As I know, Evgeny Vaganov did not >>bay tickets until now, but he informed of my dat...

    6. Re: Climatic warming in Tasmania - 839635440.txt1996-08-10 00:04:00

      Subject: Re: Climatic warming in Tasmania Date: Fri, 09 Aug 1996 20:04:00 +1100 Cc: Ed Cook <drdendro@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>, NNU-NB@xxxxxxxxx.xxx, k.briffa@xxxxxxxxx.xxx, Mike Barbetti <mikeb@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>, zetterberg@xxxxxxxxx.xxx, rjf@xxxxxxxxx.xxx Dear Neville, You mentioned to me some time ago that in your view, the 11-year solar cycle did not influence temperature. There have been numerous attempts by academics to establish a correlation, but e...

    7. Re: Your help, please? - 839858862.txt1996-08-12 14:07:42

      Subject: Re: Your help, please? Date: Mon, 12 Aug 1996 10:07:42 -0600 (MDT) Cc: trenbert@xxxxxxxxx.xxx, boville@xxxxxxxxx.xxx, branst@xxxxxxxxx.xxx, kiehl@xxxxxxxxx.xxx, francisb@xxxxxxxxx.xxx, rjcicero@xxxxxxxxx.xxx, covey@xxxxxxxxx.xxx, tom@xxxxxxxxx.xxx, curry@xxxxxxxxx.xxx, pdadd@xxxxxxxxx.xxx, gates5@xxxxxxxxx.xxx, graumlich@xxxxxxxxx.xxx, dennis@xxxxxxxxx.xxx, barafu@xxxxxxxxx.xxx, tkarl@xxxxxxxxx.xxx, lindzen@xxxxxxxxx.xxx, liu@xxxxxxxxx.x...

    8. No Subject - 841293339.txt1996-08-29 04:35:39

      Subject: No Subject Date: Thu, 29 Aug 1996 00:35:39 +0100 From: CPCMB::F055 11-JUL-1995 10:53:56.46 To: MX%"pierce@xxxxxxxxx.xxx" CC: F055 Subj: Re: Hi and questions Dave You're right, smoothing the P-E field is a much bigger change than adding a bit of noise, or the statistical model feedback. But some papers give the indication that the strong instability/variability of the thermohaline circulation under traditional mixed boundary c...

    9. Re: - 841418825.txt1996-08-30 15:27:05

      Subject: Re: Date: Fri Aug 30 11:27:05 1996 At 13:52 27/08/96 -0500, you wrote: >Dear Keith, > > I have been asked to write a white paper on the possibility for the >paleo community to interact with CLIVAR. > > Evidently part of the jow has been made during the Venice meeting, >but I would like to know if you have somme recent recent work of yours that >I could include in this paper. > > Any suggestion woulmd be welcome. > ...

    10. Re: russian data - 842992948.txt1996-09-17 20:42:28

      Subject: Re: russian data Date: Tue Sep 17 16:42:28 1996 Gary, it's great to hear from you. The stuff you are doing is very interesting to say the least. From the details you give the precip. stuff looks the more relevant for the Holocene though I note that you don't have a manuscript yet. The other stuff is of course interesting but I would have to see it and the board would want the larger implications of the stats clearly phrased in gene...

    11. Re: shiyatov - 842996314.txt1996-09-17 21:38:34

      Subject: Re: shiyatov Date: Tue Sep 17 17:38:34 1996 Dear Stepan I have received the receipts. Thankyou. Unfortunately I have also heard that our request to COPERNICUS was not successfull. I am very disappointed about this. The letter I recieved said that the proposal " was not considered relevant" so you can imagine that I am seriously exploring what this is all about. I have just returned from a PEP3 meeting in Paris . I tried to emphasise...

    12. kyrgyzstan and siberian data - 843161829.txt1996-09-19 19:37:09

      Subject: kyrgyzstan and siberian data Date: Thu, 19 Sep 1996 15:37:09 -0700 Keith, Thanks for your consideration. Once I get a draft of the central and southern siberian data and talk to Stepan and Eugene I'll send it to you. I really wish I could be more positive about the Kyrgyzstan material, but I swear I pulled every trick out of my sleeve trying to milk something out of that. It was pretty funny though - I told Malcolm what you said abo...

    13. Rashit - 844968241.txt1996-10-10 17:24:01

      Subject: Rashit Date: Thu, 10 Oct 96 13:24:01 +0500 Dear Keith, enclosed are data concerning Yamal chronology. 1 - list of samples: 139 subfossil samples (checked only), covered time span from about 350 BC and 18 samples from living trees (jah- from Yada river, m- and x- Hadyta river, por- from Portsa river); 2 - general chronology (1248 BC - 1994 AD). I have some little doubt about 360 BC - may be it is false. It was found that in chronology I ...

    14. new sciwentist feature - 845217169.txt1996-10-13 14:32:49

      Subject: new sciwentist feature Date: 13 Oct 96 10:32:49 EDT Keith, This is my first draft of the dendrochronology feature. I wonder if you have time to go through look. I hope you recognise the quotes, but please makes changes if they think they misrepresent you. And if you can answer any of the questions in square brackets that would be most useful. Ideally, can you not change the full text but make notes, remarks, answers referring to ...

    15. the Yamal data - 846715553.txt1996-10-30 22:45:53

      Subject: the Yamal data Date: Wed Oct 30 17:45:53 1996 Dear Rashit, As always I seem to have been away bullshiting and politiking in various meetings for weeks! I try to convince myself that this is of use to us as a dendrochronological community but I am not so sure how much that is really true these days. I have the data you sent and I had to get someone here to decode it for me . That is fine now so I would like to try and reformat an...

    16. the Yamal data - 846781264.txt1996-10-31 17:01:04

      Subject: the Yamal data Date: Thu Oct 31 12:01:04 1996 Dear Rashit, In looking at the data I now see that you have only sent data from abot 350bc onwards. What is the situation with the earlier data. I am very interested in the details of the 1st millennium B.C. and especially this period from about 500 to 100 B.C. We still have a gap in the Tornetrask data at about 350 B.C. I was of the opinion that this period was very low growth in th...

    17. Re: message from Vaganov - 847838200.txt1996-11-12 22:36:40

      Subject: Re: message from Vaganov Date: Tue Nov 12 17:36:40 1996 Cc: tatm@xxxxxxxxx.xxx Eugene I have not received my copy of the book. A message to Malcolm is the best idea. I have been experimenting with the Yamal data mostly trying to fit RCS curves - and am finding problems with recent local chronologies behaving oddly - i.e. too much growth in recent years makes it difficult to derive a valid age/growth curve. I have produced a rcs s...

    18. 1996 global temperatures - 848679780.txt1996-11-22 16:23:00

      Subject: 1996 global temperatures Date: Fri, 22 Nov 1996 11:23 +0000 (GMT) Cc: llivingston@xxxxxxxxx.xxx, djcarson@xxxxxxxxx.xxx, ckfolland@xxxxxxxxx.xxx Phil Remember all the fun we had last year over 1995 global temperatures, with early release of information (via Oz), "inventing" the December monthly value, letters to Nature etc etc? I think we should have a cunning plan about what to do this year, ...

    19. Re: EU proposals - 848695896.txt1996-11-22 20:51:36

      Subject: EU proposals > Wolfgang, > > This email (see below) has just arrived from Andrew Friend. I wonder if we > are in danger of competing amongst ourselves here, or is the role of N > sufficiently far away to avoid problems? Do you want me to talk with Andrew > again or shall I wait for you to get back to me next week after contacting > Martin? Would Gerd Esser be one of 'our' C modellers? > > Looking at the call for proposals it see...

    20. from Rashit - 850159177.txt1996-12-09 19:19:37

      Subject: from Rashit Date: Mon, 9 Dec 96 14:19:37 +0500 Dear Keith, we received your letters concerning our paper for Dendrochronologia and three long chronologies. 1. As regards individual ring width data of living trees from Yamal we would remind you that you have them. Stepan gave to you in England one diskette. There are data for Larix sibirica from three sites (KHA - from Khadyta river, 67812'N 69850'E; JAH - from Yahody river 67807'N 6985...

    21. the paper - 850162662.txt1996-12-09 20:17:42

      Subject: the paper Date: Mon Dec 9 15:17:42 1996 Dear Rashit and Stepan Thanks for the message and the missing data info. I will make some additions and include a plot/list of these missing years. I assume you don't mind me including your plot of the recent Yamal curve and statistics about crossdating with Polar Urals. I'll send ammended paper as soon as possible. Thanks for the quick reply. Do you have a working fax? best...

    22. ECLAT 2 - 850320678.txt1996-12-11 16:11:18

      Subject: ECLAT 2 Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 11:11:18 +0200 Cc: m.hulme@xxxxxxxxx.xxx Dear David/Mike, Thanks for sending me the ECLAT 2 proposal. First, let me say that I support the idea of a continued role for activities co-ordinating and facilitating the provision of climate change information for EC impacts research and other related research and policy. ECLAT 2 is one way of achieving this, but the fact that it is a Concerted Action Initiative...

    23. RE: Scengen and CC:Train - 853426848.txt1997-01-16 15:00:48

      Subject: Re: Scengen and CC:Train Dick, And Happy New Year to you also. You've posed me a tricky one re. SCENGEN and my answer about it being incorporated into the CC:Train package as a component tool is going to have to be 'no'. Let me explain. We too here have plans to exploit SCENGEN (and MAGICC) in a training/educational context. I ran a pilot seminar here for UNEP before Christmas on scenario construction, although this was using the n...

    24. Russia - 854306192.txt1997-01-26 19:16:32

      Subject: Russia Date: Sun, 26 Jan 1997 14:16:32 -0500 Hi Keith: As you are aware, the situation in Russia is very uncertain with their unfortunate economic condition, especially science support. There is interest, hope, and dots on maps showing intent but actual activity is difficult to judge. In the particular area I am interested in, the Taymyr, there is no current active tree-ring research going on although it has been previously sampled and...

    25. sulfur discussion paper - 857600338.txt1997-03-05 22:18:58

      Subject: sulfur discussion paper Date: Wed, 05 Mar 1997 17:18:58 +0000 Sulfur Emissions in New IPCC Scenarios Arnulf Gruebler, IIASA SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ACTIVITIES 1. Review and comments of present sulfur discussion paper 2. Revision by sulfur paper lead author 3. Preparation of comparison of regional sulfur scenarios (by lead author with inputs from other members of writing team and experts) Timing: August 1997. 4. Specification of minim...

    26. from Vaganov - 857677215.txt1997-03-06 19:40:15

      Subject: from Vaganov Date: Thu, 6 Mar 97 14:40:15 +0000 (KRS) 06.03.97 fAJL partid.txt 2.1 CO 2.2 Professor 2.3 Head of Group 2.4 M 2.5 Fritz 2.6 2.7 Schweingruber 2.8.1 Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research 2.8.2 Department of Ecology 2.8.3 Forest and Climate Research Unit 2.9 2.10 Zuercherstrasse 111 2.11 2.12 8903 2.13 Birmensdorf 2.14 CH 2.15 41 1 7392281 2.16 41 1 7392215 ...

    27. from Rashit - 860182002.txt1997-04-04 19:26:42

      Subject: from Rashit >Return-Receipt-To: tatm@xxxxxxxxx.xxx >Lines: 106 > >Dear Keith, >we received your letters concerning our paper for Dendrochronologia >and three long chronologies. >1. As regards individual ring width data of living trees from >Yamal we would remind you that you have them. Stepan gave to you >in England one diskette. There are data for Larix sibirica from >three sites (KHA - from Khadyta river, 67812'N 69850'E; JAH - >from Y...

    28. from Shiyatov - 862839883.txt1997-05-05 13:44:43

      Subject: from Shiyatov Date: Mon, 5 May 97 09:44:43 +0500 Dear Keith, After our long silence we would like inform you about our sucesses, problems and plans. 1. The main success to our mind is the next. We have filled up the gap (1350-1250 BC) between the absolutely dated 3250-year Yamal chronology and the nearest floating chronology. It was happened few weeks ago using samples collected in 1996. Now there are no obstacles to develop in the n...

    29. Keith Briffa - 865941506.txt1997-06-10 11:18:26

      Subject: Keith Briffa Date: Tue, 10 Jun 97 07:18:26 +0400 (MSD) Dear Keith, Thank you for the message of 5 June, 1997. I am anderstanding your difficulties with transfering money and I think the best way for us if you will bring money to Krasnoyarsk and I give you a receipt. Rashit will go to Yamal at the end of June and I go to the Polar Urals at the beginnind of July. We can find money temporary at our Institute and other sources for three...

    30. from Shiyatov - 866572566.txt1997-06-17 18:36:06

      Subject: from Shiyatov Date: Tue, 17 Jun 97 14:36:06 +0500 Dear Keith, I am not sure you received my message sent the last week from Moscow. Therefore I decided to repeat it. Thank you for the message of 5 June,1997. I am anderstanding your difficulties with transfering money and I think the best way for us if you will bring money to Krasnoyarsk and I give you a receipt. Rashit will go to Yamal at the end of June and I go to the Polar Urals ...

    31. No Subject - 870465098.txt1997-08-01 19:51:38

      Subject: No Subject Date: Fri, 01 Aug 1997 15:51:38 +0200 <x-rich> Dear Participants, Please find attached the Minutes of the SRES Meeting in Laxenburg, June 14-16. 1997. Please note that the list of participants will be sent additionally Monday, 4th of August. Best regards, Arnulf </x-rich> Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\finalmin.doc" <x-rich> <center>Dr. Arnulf Gruebler Environmentally Compatible Energy Strategies Inter...

    32. Letter - 872202064.txt1997-08-21 22:21:04

      Subject: Letter Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 18:21:04 +0100 Dear Tony and Michael, The final draft of the letter to the Times is attached, incorperating your changes (I hope I have combined them in a way that you are both happy with). Brian Hoskins and Adrian Jenkins have both decided that they prefer not to sign the letter, although agreeing with its message. I haven't been able to contact anyone else in the short time available, so I leave it up ...

    33. IPCC - a) Meeting, 17-19. Sept. 97; b) New Bureau - 876171248.txt1997-10-06 20:54:08

      Subject: IPCC - a) Meeting, 17-19. Sept. 97; b) New Bureau Date: Mon, 06 Oct 1997 16:54:08 +0200 Cc: macdon@xxxxxxxxx.xxx, jaeger@xxxxxxxxx.xxx, leo@xxxxxxxxx.xxx, johnson@xxxxxxxxx.xxx, mcdonald@xxxxxxxxx.xxx <x-rich>Dear Colleagues, I would like to take this opportunity to thank all of you who have attended the SRES Lead Authors' meeting (17-19 September 1997) and Rob Swart and his colleagues from RIVM for organizing and hosting the meeti...

    34. Copy of: climate: Japanese proposal - 876250531.txt1997-10-07 18:55:31

      Subject: climate: Japanese proposal Message-ID: <199710051347_MC2-22DC-A5E4@xxxxxxxxx.xxx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Andrew Kerr, WWF Climate Change Campaign re.: "scandalous" Japanese climate change proposal Dear All I am in Japan for the next week. If you need to, you can contact me by phone at the following numbers: * Monday - +81 10 760 5022 (Yurika?s mobile) * Tuesday-Thursday - via WWF Ja...

    35. Timing, Distribution of the Statement - 876437553.txt1997-10-09 22:52:33

      Subject: Timing, Distribution of the Statement Date: Thu, 9 Oct 1997 18:52:33 0100 Reply-to: alcamo@xxxxxxxxx.xxx Mike, Rob, Sounds like you guys have been busy doing good things for the cause. I would like to weigh in on two important questions -- Distribution for Endorsements -- I am very strongly in favor of as wide and rapid a distribution as possible for endorsements. I think the only thing that counts is numbers. The media is going...

    36. (Fwd) Re: Your Holocene paper with Barnett et al 6.3 1996 page 255 - 876860264.txt1997-10-14 20:17:44

      Subject: Re: Your Holocene paper with Barnett et al 6.3 1996 page 255 Cc: bsanter@xxxxxxxxx.xxx David, I can only suggest you contact Ben Santer who did the analysis for Table 1. Ben is generally very busy - his email is bsanter@xxxxxxxxx.xxx . Cheers Phil At 01:10 PM 10/13/97 -0700, you wrote: > Two quick questions about your Fig 1, power spectrum of global mean >averaged temperature. > >1) You don't provide units. I would have...

    37. Re: - 878654527.txt1997-11-04 14:42:07

      Subject: Re: Date: Tue Nov 4 09:42:07 1997 Tom please do. Actually I would be interested to know whether Malcolm mentioned these results to Dave as he was in Krasnoyarsk a few months ago when I showed this stuff. I will be over in New York in a few weeks to discuss with Ed the possibility of putting in an NSF/NERC proposal to look at the tree biomass change question. Also,the initial impetus to redo this stuff was as part of a NERC project w...

    38. re: positives and negatives - 879365369.txt1997-11-12 20:09:29

      Subject: re: positives and negatives Date: Wed, 12 Nov 97 15:09:29 CET Cc: "timothy.mitchell" <timothy.mitchell@xxxxxxxxx.xxx> >It would indeed be interesting to poll all of our invitees using a more >sophisticated >questionnaire, but this is not what we are about. For example, if you >disagree >with the Statement I would be interested to know the grounds of your >disagreement. Mike, Thanks. I am always worried about this sort of things. Ev...

    39. Re: Finalising PRAPROC! 21st November 1997 - 879803996.txt1997-11-17 21:59:56

      Subject: Re: Finalising PRAPROC! 21st November 1997 Date: Mon, 17 Nov 1997 16:59:56 -0800 Reply-to: r.baker@xxxxxxxxx.xxx Mike > I hope you had my comments from a few weeks ago. Yes, sorry I've taken so long to reply. > 1. Overheads: we charge EU projects 20% overheads and these are totally > acceptable Yes, you are quite right. > 2. Budget: I will need to redraft our budget. Please tell me estimated > start data and for how long the pr...

    40. Re: ATTENTION. Invitation to influence Kyoto. - 880476729.txt1997-11-25 16:52:09

      Subject: Re: ATTENTION. Invitation to influence Kyoto. Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 11:52:09 -0700 (MST) Reply-to: Tom Wigley <wigley@xxxxxxxxx.xxx> Cc: Mike Hulme <m.hulme@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>, t.mitchell@xxxxxxxxx.xxx Dear Eleven, I was very disturbed by your recent letter, and your attempt to get others to endorse it. Not only do I disagree with the content of this letter, but I also believe that you have severely distorted the IPCC "view" when you say...